@Michael - you didn't just render an opinion but rather made an assumption of fact - that the author was making a 9/11 joke at the expense of the NYC victims and *then* you rendered an opinion, mainly that said (falsely assumed) joke was in poor taste which I would actually agree with you on, if such a joke had been made. You're getting railed here because of your false factual assumption, not your opinion.

Common tactic of those who want to make ad hominem attacks is to bury a statement of fact inside of an opinion, hoping the listener/reader will not notice that the fact is, in itself, inaccurate as they focus on the opinion. Better avoid that or else those with three functioning brain cells will see right through it. Those with only two will praise the wisdom of Simon Cowell :-O.

TW

@Thomas

You are... who? Do I know you? Apologies for having an opinion. I guess we all know how big a crime that is on the internet. =)

@ subzero0951 and Bernie:
Glad I'm not the only one who thinks that comment is outrageous... cheers guys.

@Micheal who is doin 9/11 jokes? Not Craig, he was just pointing out that they don't use the mm/dd/yyyy (11/9/2010) format, they use the dd/mm/yyyy (9/11/2010) format so to them it would appear to be released on September 11th. So please read carefully and fully before you call someone "tasteless" or call them out on a non existent joke

Just seen the trailer on GT, looks like the story telling will be flashbacks. Perhaps you're playing the member who got captured and currently being tortured for info? I'm waiting to see more of this at E3 if they do make an appearance. Let's just hope this game will help Activision regain their stride.