<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PS3 is too Complicated for Valve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3vault.com/ps3-is-too-complicated-for-valve-5066/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3vault.com/ps3-is-too-complicated-for-valve-5066</link>
	<description>PS3Vault offers news and reviews for the latest PS3 games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:18:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ClearConscious</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3vault.com/ps3-is-too-complicated-for-valve-5066/comment-page-1#comment-159503</link>
		<dc:creator>ClearConscious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3vault.com/?p=5066#comment-159503</guid>
		<description>I see your point Mike but I have to take the side against Valve. Should Valve be consistently praised for stuff that they have made in the past. Well yes however, They have failed to make any genre defining titles for any platform and there source engine hasn&#039;t been updated significantly either. Valve is just content take advantage of the user base they have built up in the past. Look at L4D, totally overrated game. Very light on content and now they are making a sequel and releasing it less than a year after the first one came out. The standard in the industry is at least 2 years of development for a sequel. There complete lack of innovation and the inability to adapt to a very different market is troublesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point Mike but I have to take the side against Valve. Should Valve be consistently praised for stuff that they have made in the past. Well yes however, They have failed to make any genre defining titles for any platform and there source engine hasn&#8217;t been updated significantly either. Valve is just content take advantage of the user base they have built up in the past. Look at L4D, totally overrated game. Very light on content and now they are making a sequel and releasing it less than a year after the first one came out. The standard in the industry is at least 2 years of development for a sequel. There complete lack of innovation and the inability to adapt to a very different market is troublesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ad Hominem</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3vault.com/ps3-is-too-complicated-for-valve-5066/comment-page-1#comment-159468</link>
		<dc:creator>Ad Hominem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3vault.com/?p=5066#comment-159468</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Mr. O&#039;Connor. Oh paragon of infinite gaming wisdom comparable to a Mormon elder pontificating on methamphetamine. EA did publish orange box, but valve also put it out on 360, and neither versions of Team Fortress 2 are getting DLC updates that the PC users are getting. Heaven forbid a software firm invest some time and commitment to better their knowledge and capital by developing one title for the PlayStation 3. Half-Life had its own content on the PlayStation 2. 
You seem overly content to defending Valve&#039;s position of not wanting to venture into developing for the newer playstation console. It&#039;s overly-conscious for the corporation lackeys like you who need to get a nine foot rope, put it around your neck and take a plunge off a twenty foot cliff. Valve has people who handle PR and their decisions, I don&#039;t need your hubris pissing on the good point that people who may have only invested in a ps3 and don&#039;t have a gaming pc or xbox want one of their titles. Crawl back to your rock under the steam user forums and stay there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Mr. O&#8217;Connor. Oh paragon of infinite gaming wisdom comparable to a Mormon elder pontificating on methamphetamine. EA did publish orange box, but valve also put it out on 360, and neither versions of Team Fortress 2 are getting DLC updates that the PC users are getting. Heaven forbid a software firm invest some time and commitment to better their knowledge and capital by developing one title for the PlayStation 3. Half-Life had its own content on the PlayStation 2.<br />
You seem overly content to defending Valve&#8217;s position of not wanting to venture into developing for the newer playstation console. It&#8217;s overly-conscious for the corporation lackeys like you who need to get a nine foot rope, put it around your neck and take a plunge off a twenty foot cliff. Valve has people who handle PR and their decisions, I don&#8217;t need your hubris pissing on the good point that people who may have only invested in a ps3 and don&#8217;t have a gaming pc or xbox want one of their titles. Crawl back to your rock under the steam user forums and stay there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3vault.com/ps3-is-too-complicated-for-valve-5066/comment-page-1#comment-158616</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3vault.com/?p=5066#comment-158616</guid>
		<description>&quot;Valve are prick’s that doesn’t know how to develop games&quot;.

Yeah, Valve, creators of some of the most revolutionary FPS games of the entire genre, and constant innovative new franchises, don&#039;t know how to develop games.

,...right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Valve are prick’s that doesn’t know how to develop games&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yeah, Valve, creators of some of the most revolutionary FPS games of the entire genre, and constant innovative new franchises, don&#8217;t know how to develop games.</p>
<p>,&#8230;right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
