Comments on: 360 is Maxed Out, PS3 is Not, Says EA

By: XBoxFails

XBoxFails — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:41:14 +0000

LOL GG 360. The 360 fanboys wont admit it, but most people have known this for a little while now, especially after seeing the quality difference in the exclusives that came out recently (ie KZ2). Good to hear some more companies feel the same way.

Natal to me looks like a gimmick, and with no reason whatsoever to get a 360 (no games besides shooters, and most are on the PC anyway), (except for Ace Combat – I really like that game), I think PS3 can safetly say it is the best truly next gen console out today. Cheaper price for the whole package, free online, better games, blu-ray for truly HD media, better quality of hardware, its a good time to be a ps3 owner!

By: Dangthing

Dangthing — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:04:08 +0000

Its time they started to realize this, I keep hearing bull about the Xbox being more powerful, having all this crap that it doesn’t have or that no one has ever used in a game before. Truthfully even though some claim,that the RSX is less powerful than the ATI in the Xbox the Ps3 could easily just dedicate a few SPU’s to graphics and run it smoothly anyways. Yet somehow I doubt the RSX is one bit less powerful than the ATI graphics card.

PS3 has
More exclusives
Free online
Better Graphics
Longer Supported Span
Blu-ray
Blue tooth
Comes with a WIFI Card
Motion Sensing, wireless, 3rd gen rumble controller
Oh and I forgot the 2 Terabits per second of processing horsepower.

And people wonder why its still going and Xbox isn’t.

By: Winzzzy

Winzzzy — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:32:55 +0000

Wow GAME-HERO, that was a bit intense, over the top, and dripping with venom. I understand that everyone has preferences, but the sites comments do lean towards the “I for some reason have to belittle someone’s system because they bought a different one.”

For the record I own both systems. I think the 360 implements online usage better and up to this point the games have looked better on it (particularly sharpness of textures). The PS3 should have the better looking games in the future, has blue ray, and can get massive storage upgrades cheap. Both have great exclusives and are worth owning in their own right, which is why I have both.

It is a bit much to see much the 360 gets bashed on this site. For the record I paid less for my PS3 ($330) than my 360 ($400) and it has blue ray, but if I could only have one to JUST play games I’d pick the 360. Of course I don’t just play games so the Blue Ray wins. Since I can afford both I win =)